Pages

Saturday, December 31, 2022

new Years Eve 2022

 Well, it's just about 8 hours from 2023 here as I start this, and Jo-Anne already beats me to the best I have to say...

Hello 2023 I hope you are going to be good to me 2022 kicked me in the arse

It's been 2023 for 11 hours in some places (including for 6 hours for Jo-Anne).  It has been my habit in the past to look at my top looked at posts on the blog at this point, but a funny thing about that- all of my most looked at posts, excepting a lone spike in early March, came by January 31.  From there on, with that one exception, nothing broke 30 views.  Whether that means I've gone completely boring, Blogger found a way to chop out all the spam pageviews, or what, it takes the 'fun' (probably a good thing) out of statistics posts.  So we'll do it Jo-Anne's way.

No party this year.  The kids broke up for good, KC's looking forward to a date of some kind, and frankly, Laurie and I have been hacking up little lungs for about a week now.  No beer in the house, unless you count KC's mispurchase of a peppermint stout (which I don't).  Just some leftover wine our neighbors gave us for Christmas.

Once again this year, we had more than celebrity deaths affect us- Laurie lost her brother Paul.  Which pales in comparison, numerically speaking,  compared to my surviving brother in law, who lost a brother, a sister, and a brother in law in the space of about a month and a half to start this year.  I'm waiting at this point to see who's going to complete the hat trick of dying celebrities this weekend after Pope Emeritus Francis and Barbara Walters.

Paul, like the song, is the tall one in back.

 

On the other hand, we still celebrate life.  Laurie will become a Great Aunt for the 6th time shortly, this time by her youngest niece. While other illnesses kept us from Isaiah's, we had a great time at Grayson's birthday.  And Misty had her fourth birthday and third gotcha day.

Misty.  While there was an 'internet scare' a couple months back, she is alive and well, if a little less in the stamina department and a little more in the 'gray' and 'fat' departments, and is putting on  enough of a winter coat I've been calling her "Fluffy Butt".  She made her first trip(s) to the End of the Earth ( a place, not in heaven).  Not to mention her first walk to Shoaff Park, a repeat of the "Long Trail" walk (which came out much better than the last, lol), and a Happy Boofus Day to Chain'O'Lakes.

 

"On my way to Doggie State Park!"

 


Someone say gray?  I turned 60 this year- officially the first year I said, "HOW old?", and leaving me celebrating 60 years with the likes of Thor, The Hulk, Spider Man, and Doctor Doom.



The Christmas lights have hung dead since Christmas Eve, and I&M's don't-use-unneccesary-power edict during the lovely week of below-zero temps (Oh, yeah, Jo-Anne's way- the lovely week of -20 and under temps).  Yet, they hang, and the village collects dust (which, in this house, is shaped a lot like dog hair).  All in all, a raggedy end to a raggedy year.


But... let me add just the one more thing for the 8-34 viewers this post will get:

Dear Lord, I ask for your blessings on this new year. I ask that You push aside the darkness with your light. I ask that You teach us that love isn't tolerance of sin, but sincere desire that no man waste their soul in hell. I ask that you teach us that You don't have a political party, and that there is no flag on the Cross. I ask that You point out and underline the precious moments all around us. I pray that You show each of us that Truth in Your Word that we need, that we might banish pride, and the million sins that come from it, from our lives. And I pray that everyone will take the time to set aside hubris and seek Your Son, whom we ALL need. Amen.

Thursday, December 29, 2022

Ye olde sickness update

 Yep, we've been pretty much laid out since Christmas Eve, and just starting to recover.So plan is for M10 show to pick up next week with some form of the best of 2022, and returning to M10 after.  I'll likely do (but not post) a new M10 next week, but right now I haven't the ambition.  Hopefully I'll gin up some energy to talk to y'all again before the new year.

Wednesday, December 28, 2022

Wednesday Bible Study: Ladies Night part 3

 

Today we look at Rachel- and to understand her, Leah as well.  In a lot of ways, the story of Rachel seems like the Bible's fairy tale- The beautiful princess, the handsome prince (Jacob), the evil father (Laban) and sister.  But that's not the reality.

At the risk of making this a Jacob post, I want to point out two things that set a tone for this.  Jacob, perhaps you recall, had two encounters with the heavenly- one being the stairway to heaven he saw BEFORE he met Rachel, and the "Man" (preincarnate Jesus) he wrestled on the way back home.  The latter would strengthen him for the challenges to come; the first was to wake up his faith before dealing with Laban.


And he needed it woke up, because we find out that Laban was at heart a double dealing snake- like Jacob HAD been- and he would need his faith to avoid becoming just like Laban.  But, he didn't wake it up soon enough.  Unlike with his own mother Rebekkah, where the servant sent to find her prayed for a sign from God to know he chose rightly, Jacob trusted in love at first sight- and chose wrongly.

So what do we know about Rachel?  To separate out the 'fairy tale', I'm going to tell this out of order.  She was the younger, prettier daughter (The Jews say they may have been twins) of a man who saw everything as profit and loss.  We will see by her attitudes ( "Give me children, or I shall die!" , she tells Jacob ironically) that she is spoiled rotten by her father, and his imprint comes out in her.  And yet, when Jacob meets her, she is the shepherdess.  Not that it wasn't the cultural thing for the youngest, but I think Laban knew he created a monster, and welcomed the excuse to get her out of the house.  My reason for that?  Beyond her words, let's look at the 2 maids sent with the daughters when Jacob left.  Leah's was named Zilpah, a name that means "Fragrant drippings (of myrrh)", a sign that Leah thought well of the girl.  Rachel's maid was Bilhah, meaning "Timid", and is it too much to compare and wonder if she was 'timid' because of constant berating from Rachel? Bilhah also was the one that Reuben (possibly) raped that lost him the leadership of his brethren.  Someone used to abuse would be an easy target.

Now, you might ask, "But are you painting Laban right?  Just because he apparently pulled a fast one on Jacob..." and that's a valid question, for which I have an answer.  Just before Jacob plans their escape, he shares his thoughts with his wives, and their response says it all:

Gen 31:14  Then Rachel and Leah answered and said to him, "Is there any portion or inheritance left to us in our father's house?
Gen 31:15  Are we not regarded by him as foreigners? For he has sold us, and he has indeed devoured our money.
Gen 31:16  All the wealth that God has taken away from our father belongs to us and to our children. Now then, whatever God has said to you, do." 



While Jacob was getting rich by God's favor from Laban, Laban was robbing his daughters!  Even Leah was against her father.  But while Leah was willing to let Jacob take care of things, Rachel had to go a step further, being her father's daughter:

Gen 31:19  Laban had gone to shear his sheep, and Rachel stole her father's household gods.

Now the why of this puzzled the commentators.  One at least suggested that it was because she feared that Laban would use their 'divination powers' to find them in their escape.  This doesn't ring true, because, when he does find them...

Gen 31:30  And now you have gone away because you longed greatly for your father's house, but why did you steal my gods?"
Gen 31:31  Jacob answered and said to Laban, "Because I was afraid, for I thought that you would take your daughters from me by force.
Gen 31:32  Anyone with whom you find your gods shall not live. In the presence of our kinsmen point out what I have that is yours, and take it." Now Jacob did not know that Rachel had stolen them.
Gen 31:33  So Laban went into Jacob's tent and into Leah's tent and into the tent of the two female servants, but he did not find them. And he went out of Leah's tent and entered Rachel's.
Gen 31:34  Now Rachel had taken the household gods and put them in the camel's saddle and sat on them. Laban felt all about the tent, but did not find them.
Gen 31:35  And she said to her father, "Let not my lord be angry that I cannot rise before you, for the way of women is upon me." So he searched but did not find the household gods.


So if he'd already found them, why not fess up and give them back?  She surely knew Jacob would not go through with the threat.  Another set of commentators- and the Jews- believe she took them so her father would quit relying on them, and believe in the God of Jacob.  But, the story clearly tells us that any faith Laban had came from God Himself:

Gen 31:24  But God came to Laban the Aramean in a dream by night and said to him, "Be careful not to say anything to Jacob, either good or bad."


My opinion?  She did it to spite him- and her unforgiving heart would not relent even then.  I know, my evidence is circumstantial, but let me lay out one more layer of said evidence- plus the one lesson I really learned in studying Rachel.  Leah started bearing children first and foremost- which proved, even to Rachel, I imagine, that Leah was God's choice.  And the names she picked for them: Reuben, which meant, the Lord has looked on me, and see, I have a son!"; Simeon, meaning, "The Lord has heard me, and in hearing blessed me"; Judah, meaning "I will praise him, and celebrate".  Notice I left one out that didn't involve invoking the Lord first, and that was Levi.  But look what that name means...

A primitive root; properly to twine, that is, (by implication) to unite, to remain;

 

By this child, she was hoping to 'twine' her and Jacob together in love.  It was right after these births that Rachel exploded at Jacob, and I really think her FIRST step towards God came with Jacob's reply:

Gen 30:2  Jacob's anger was kindled against Rachel, and he said, "Am I in the place of God, who has withheld from you the fruit of the womb?"


It was then she threw Bilhah at him, and look at how she named these children:

Dan- "God has judged me, and gave me a son"- basically, God, in her mind, had to choose between the sisters.

Napthali- "With mighty wrestlings, I (not God, but herself)I have prevailed over my sister." You getting this?  Even with children- Leah had them out of seeking Jacob's love; for Rachel, it was little more than a competition.  But dig just a little deeper.  Look what the Name Napthali translates to:


A primitive root; to twine, that is, (literally) to struggle or (figuratively) be (morally) tortuous...

 

Wow.  So you can twine together in love and unity with God; or you can twine in struggle with Him (as Jacob was to do soon later).  This is the lesson I take from Jacob's second wife.  But not the end of the story.  The last two boys that Leah bore stayed with the theme: Issachar, who was born when Leah cut the deal with Rachel for the mandrakes, meant "God has brought with Him my payment"; and the next son, Zebulun, meant, "God has given me a good dowry." 

Eventually, though, Rachel must have softened for it says God "remembered Rachel, and listened to her", and gave her a son, Joseph.  The name, meaning "He is adding", is universally considered by the commentators as Rachel PREDICTING more children- in other words, "I'm not done here."  And she was right- but the curse of Jacob was about to fall.  Remember, he said the one who stole the idols would not live; and she demanded children, "or I will die!" When one demands of God, one should be careful that God doesn't change one's "or" to His "and".

Gen 35:16  Then they journeyed from Bethel. When they were still some distance from Ephrath, Rachel went into labor, and she had hard labor.
Gen 35:17  And when her labor was at its hardest, the midwife said to her, "Do not fear, for you have another son."
Gen 35:18  And as her soul was departing (for she was dying), she called his name Ben-oni; but his father called him Benjamin.
Gen 35:19  So Rachel died, and she was buried on the way to Ephrath (that is, Bethlehem)...


'Ben-oni' means 'son of my sorrow'; even then Rachel was going to afflict this child with HER pain.  Jacob, though, changed it to Benjamin, "son of my right hand"- finally saying 'no' to his willful, yet beloved, wife.

In the end, we see Rachel named in Jeremiah's prophecy about the killing of the innocents by Herod:

Jer 31:15  Thus says the LORD: "A voice is heard in Ramah, lamentation and bitter weeping. Rachel is weeping for her children; she refuses to be comforted for her children, because they are no more."

Because the blood of these children was spilled in Bethlehem, where Rachel's body lie, and even here she is bitter for her loss.  But the prophecy goes on...

Jer 31:16  Thus says the LORD: "Keep your voice from weeping, and your eyes from tears, for there is a reward for your work, declares the LORD, and they shall come back from the land of the enemy.
Jer 31:17  There is hope for your future, declares the LORD, and your children shall come back to their own country.


This was the lesson Rachel needed to learn- a lesson Leah knew all along.

Friday, December 23, 2022

M10 show, week #53

 


So what'd you find for Christmas, Boss?

Well, I figured we'd have some fun with the Martin Era 2.0 songs that were at Cashbox's #1 on Christmas- but instead of a dry list, I thought maybe I could 'give awards' to the notable ones.

Awards?  Like what?

Well, like the songs that were number one on the charts released exactly on Christmas Day- 1965's Over And Over by the Dave Clark Five, 1971's Brand New Key by Melanie, and 1976's You Make Me Feel Like Dancing by Leo Sayer.

They don't sound too Christmas-y...

Well, unlike the UK, where they compete for the Christmas #1, and here nowadays, where All I Want For Christmas Is You has been at #1 for 4 straight Christmases, it was just a matter of what hit on what week during the Martin Era.  The UK had 5 Christmas songs hit #1 in the ME 2.0; we had just one- Dave Seville and The Chipmunk Song.

Wow.  So tell me more, like, did I have a #1 at Christmas?

Not yet.  First, intro our one debut of the week...

Sure! This'n is from a new act called Cafuné, an' the lp came out in 2019, an' supposedly it was a rock chart #4 then, but Chris found it on the current alt chart a week or two ago- only he can't prove it, because the site he goes to has the Alt chart stuck showing the combination of December weeks put together- even though all their OTHER charts are working!  Anyways, here is Cafuné at #8 with Tek It...



**********************************************

 

All right, let's look at some more of my award winners...

Most Appropriate- The Chipmunk Song, Alvin and the Chipmunks

Least Appropriate- a tie between the Staple Singers' Let's Do It Again and Bill Justis' Raunchy

Most times on the list- again a tie with 2 each for Guy Mitchell (Singing The Blues, Heartaches By The Number) and the Monkees (I'm A Believer, Daydream Believer)

My Favorite- My Sweet Lord, George Harrison

My Least Favorite- You Make Me Feel Like Dancing, Leo Sayer

How many girls did it- just 3: Helen Reddy (Angie Baby), Melanie (Brand New Key), and the Singing Nun (Dominique)

Biggest hit- according to Billboard, I'm A Believer

First one in the Martin Era- Sixteen Tons, Tennessee Ernie Ford

Whut about me?

I saved that one for last!  Why don't you give us the rest of the M10, and I'll give out the rest afterwards?

Sure...

10- and holdin', Beyond The Vale, Smashing Pumpkins

9-  and holdin' , Morrissey's Rebels Without Applause

7- one last week for Broken Bells and Love On The Run- it'll finish #2 all time on the M10...

6- the next three all go up 2 spots, startin' with Smalltown Poets an' Christmas Time Again..

5- White Reaper with Pages...

4- an' Lucius with Muse.

3- Talk drops two from the top with Run Away To Mars

2 The Four Seasons stuck here with Sleeping Man

An' the new top dog...

 


 ...Joji an' Die For You!

 

Now, then...

All right, to answer our last two questions...

Wait, two? What's the other one?

Did Elvis have a Christmas #1? Yes, Are You Lonesome Tonight!

All right!  But whut's th...

And, did the Beatles have one?

Aw, who car...

Yes, I Feel Fine!

Tune in next time for the last show of the year- and maybe by then I'll have figured out how I'm gonna do the year-end countdown!

Thursday, December 22, 2022

Misty's Gotcha Day

 

Today (well, Wednesday) is our third anniversary of bringing Misty home.  This is like the last of three celebrations she gets- a Happy Boofus Day one warm spring day; he birthday in the Summer; and today (well, Wednesday).  First, we took a hearty walk...

And much nicer, 31F today...

Neighbor doggies Fifi (I think) and her brother (IDK the name...or gender, actually) wish Misty a Happy Gotcha day...

Click on this one to see the neat designs for the holidays on their windows

Outside of birds, this was our only critter sighting

I was letting her choose the path, so first we go to the woods.  Here, she's just come off of a disc golf path we never take, followed by a little off-roading, and she's totally confused.

Back on track, she can see the Ravine Trail better than me with all these leaves...


Mastodon Santa

There was quite the gathering at south bridge.  Besides the cardinals, there was a robin, a blue jay, and a contingent of the Sparrow Mafia

We get to the river, she wants to go over the bridge- I said No. So she went under the bridge...

...and down a ways, looking for the unfrozen water that just wasn't there.  Sorry, baby!

Again, she wants to cross the bridge.  Again, I say no. She then "mope-walks" all the way to the Swamp...

She has me go into the rough, lumpy grounds on the other side of the road.  At first I expected varmintage, but she was actually still looking for unfrozen water.  Thankfully, she found none.

Then, when we got home (and warmed up), we had the rest of her celebration.  First, her cupcakes, which we all shared...

 

May be an image of 1 person, sitting, dog and indoor                 

May be an image of 1 person, dog and indoor
                           
May be an image of 1 person, dog and indoor

                                                                            Yummm! 

...then a tray of soft doggie treat...

 


                           


                                                                        


And finally, a new baby to tear up...

(Note:  Laurie put the video of this on FB, but FB won't let you post up videos on my blog.  HOWever, I am a master of pulling stills...)


     

        

        

         


A good time was had by all!

Wednesday, December 21, 2022

Wednesday Bible Study: Ladies' Night part 2

 

In a Bible study with my son, I wisely said, "Studying a Bible character not named Jesus is a lot like paleontology.  Sometimes you get most of a skeleton, sometimes part of a jawbone.  Now if you can look at that fragment and say, 'this is like the same part on a 60 foot long, walks-on-all-fours dinosaur that lived in a swamp, we can extrapolate that it probably looked like this'. We can do the same with SOME tradition- but it's got to fit a character.  We can't randomly put a big sail, feathers, or a spiked tail on a piece that we've never known to have them."


And the fragment of a jawbone I have this week is a lady who's taken a bad rap over the years- Eve.  And I wanted to paint her in a more complete light, but there's just not a lot there.  I'm going to bring up some things that are opinion- that I will try to back- to get a better understanding of what she was like and what really happened.  I hope you'll indulge me here.

I want to start with my first, and lesser, extrapolation, to set the scene.   The bad guy of our scene is, of course, the serpent...

Gen 3:1  Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, "Did God actually say, 'You shall not eat of any tree in the garden'?"
Gen 3:2  And the woman said to the serpent, "We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden,
Gen 3:3  but God said, 'You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.'"
Gen 3:4  But the serpent said to the woman, "You will not surely die.
Gen 3:5  For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."


Okay, so we have a talking snake- or do we?  Go back just a wee bit to this convo with Adam:

Gen 2:18  Then the LORD God said, "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him."
Gen 2:19  Now out of the ground the LORD God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.
Gen 2:20  The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him.


Now, consider this- none of these animals told Adam what they were called- HE named Them.  So we can suppose the serpent talking is a difference in the garden.  This would indicate that Satan had taken some possession of the animal.  But wait-look back at 3:1- it's the ANIMAL that's more crafty.  Satan was using an innate ability of the animal, perhaps.  Did Satan make a 'deal' with the animal?  Why else would God punish an otherwise 'dumb animal' at the end?

Gen 3:14  The LORD God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, cursed are you above all livestock and above all beasts of the field; on your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life..."


Here, we see the serpent was something OTHER than the snakes we know and love.  The Jews tradition says it was more of a anthropomorphic dragon when it approached Eve.A stretch?  Maybe...

Rev 12:7  Now war arose in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels fought back,
Rev 12:8  but he was defeated, and there was no longer any place for them in heaven.
Rev 12:9  And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world--he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him. 


And maybe not.  So say we've got what we might call a dragon, possessed by Satan and speaking in his voice.  Having established this, let me go on to our second bit of "tradition fill-in".  Step back to Eve's response:

Gen 3:2  And the woman said to the serpent, "We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden,
Gen 3:3  but God said, 'You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.'" 

 

Note that part I boldened- 'neither shall you touch it.'  Now, let's go back to what God REALLY said to Adam:

Gen 2:16  And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, "You may surely eat of every tree of the garden,
Gen 2:17  but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die."


Two things here.  First, and not so obvious: If you keep track of the verses and chapters, you see that this conversation happened BEFORE God made Eve.  Second, you see that 'neither shall you touch' was not in God's statement to Adam.  So ADAM had to have added it first.  Why?

God had been instructing Adam, giving him the lay of the land, as it were. Eve, however, came later and had to be instructed by Adam for the most part.  Eve is naive, and Adam is giving her a child's treatment- "If I tell her not to even TOUCH the tree, she'll stay away from it", perhaps he's thinking.  Here's where we'll veer off the track a bit yet again.  From the Jewish Encyclopedia:


Satan, or the serpent, which then had almost the shape of a man (Gen. R. xix. 1), displayed great argumentative skill in explaining the selfish reasons which had prompted God's prohibition (Pirḳe R. El. l.c.; Gen. R. xix.; Tan., Bereshit, viii.), and convinced Eve by ocular proof that the tree could be touched (comp. Ab. R. N. i. 4) without entailing death.

In fact, one of my sources said that this serpent/dragon physically pushed her into the tree to prove she wouldn't die.  Convinced that this wasn't true- and again, to naive to figure out a dragon should NOT be able to talk to her, was easily tempted as we all are, by Satan's three big attacks:

Gen 3:6  So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food...the lust of the flesh;

...and that it was a delight to the eyes...the lust of the eyes;

...and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise... the pride of life;

So, where do we go from here?  We ask, why did Adam teach her that added bit- without which, Satan would have not gotten a foothold? Because he was teaching her like she was a child.  And why was he doing that? I'm guessing pride.  So he could be higher in her esteem than God.  That would, in turn explain 2 things.  One: Why he fell so easily into eating the fruit in the first place:  Now SHE looked smarter than God, he might as well, too.  Two:  One of the questions always asked about THIS part of the verse:

 

  ...she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate. 

 

The debate always being, does this mean Adam was with her the WHOLE TIME?  I say no, because HE would have realized that a) his addition had messed things up, and b) dragons shouldn't be able to talk.  He WAS with her, though, when she brought the fruit to him and said, "See you can touch the tree!  And watch this... (chomp)."

To finish out my speculation, this is why the Bible teaches us the fault was with Adam...

Rom 5:17  For if, because of one man's trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.
Rom 5:18  Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men.
Rom 5:19  For as by the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's obedience the many will be made righteous.


(he committed the trespass and disobedience)

...and the consequence came to Eve...

1Ti 2:11  Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness.
1Ti 2:12  I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.
1Ti 2:13  For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
1Ti 2:14  and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. 


Get this- Adam was not deceived- he SINNED.  Eve did not SIN (at first)- she was tricked.  Had Adam stuck to just what God said, none of the Fall would have happened- THAT time.

So that is my reconstruction of a "dinosaur" named Eve.  Whether it is all the way right or not, God knows, not I.  All I know for sure, is it follows a familiar Biblical pattern.  Satan finds a chink in the armor, uses pride to pry it over, and you fall.  And the sin isn't the fall as much as the pride that allowed it.


Tuesday, December 20, 2022

When God calls...

 As He has been doing the last week, giving me "Tithes of time" assignments.  Today, He said, "Get out in My nature," and gave Misty that extra boost to get me going...

At least it's not total gloom today, even if it was 22F and just a couple days from an impending blizzard

Peeking through, an hour or so from clearing the clouds

And neither early nor cold enough to deter disc golfers

And as we approached the ruins of the old bridge, God said to me, "I have gifted you the ability to see past the works of man to the beauty of My creation.  You use it out here all the time- why won't you use it everywhere?"  And He's right.  Elsewhere, I see evil, I see lust, and I fail to shift into that same vision that sees the flower but not the garbage around it.  I need to do this more.



Misty checks the ice at The Swamp.


This is new... Darwin continues to press the attack, I guess...

"I can smell the water, but I can't FIND it... SNFF!"

Misty watches the heron she just scared fly away.  Saw a deer later, as well.

Can't blame the heron.  Basically the only free water in the area!


Monday, December 19, 2022

The coldest places, once again

 So we took a cold walk today- not terrible, 26F.   My favorite sweatshirt and hoodie kept me reasonable, if not toasty.  Which naturally got me thinking of the top coldest spots in the world today.  According to a site I found, here are the top ten coldest in the last 24 hours:

10- Watson Lake, Yukon, Canada


 
Location, Yukon territory, near the BC border.  Population: 790. Distance from me: 2,180 miles give or take.  Known for: "The center of the small Yukon forestry industry." Temp: -53.1 F.

9- Dzhalinda, Russia

Location: Russia/ China border between Amur Oblast and Heliongijang Province. (IOW Find the farthest north spot in China and step over the line... er, cross the river.) Population: 1,123. Distance from me: 5,675 miles. Known for:  Not much besides being cold. Temp: -53.1.

8- Tyanya, Russia

Location: 423 miles due Northeast from Dzhalinda.  Population: 499. Distance from me: 5,360 miles. Known for: Population went up 10.6% between 2001 and 2010. Temp: -53.5.

7- "Habardino", Russia

Location:  Heck, I don't know!  The lat/long for the gauge is in the middle of nowhere, in the Sakha Republic district of Mirninsky, somewhere south of the Stolovaya Morkoka soup restaurant (which got 3.6 stars) in Morkoka.  Population: For Morkoka, which is apparently the closest to civilization in the area, 76 and dropping as fast as the temperature. Distance from me: Supposedly 5,048 miles, but I'm not sure Google Maps is copius mentis right now.  Known for:  That's the problem, nobody knows it! Temp: -54.9.

6- Suon-Tit, Russia

Location:  Still in the Sakha Republic, but much farther north, about 1,350 miles dead east from the easternmost tip of Alaska. Population: 131 and dropping, but not near so fast as Morkoka.  Distance from me: a much closer 4,464 miles. Known for: The name translates to the odd "Swan-Titus".  IMHO, we just drop the "us" and officially declare it a hillbilly settlement of Swan Tit.  Temp: -55.5.

5- Mayo Airport, Canada

Location: Smack dab in the center of Yukon, not quite two miles north yet of the town of Mayo. Population: 496 in the town, probably substantially less at the airport. Distance from me: 2,532 miles give or take. Known for: Home of the First Nation of Na-Cho Nyak Dun, which we ugly Americans might call the Northern Tutchone Indians.  Temp: -56.4.

4- Pelly River Ranch, Canada

Location: 70 miles Southwest of our last stop, 25 miles and change west of the nearest 'big town' of Pelly's Crossing.  Population: The ranch is run by Dale and Sue Bradley, where they raise cattle, chickens, and whatever veggies grow in permafrost.  The nearby town clocks in at 316.  Distance from me: 2,553 miles. Known for:  The ranch, which is looking for volunteers (much luck with that) and another branch of our Northern Tutchone friends at nearby Fort Selkirk.  Temp: -56.6.

3- Olenyok, Russia

Location: Once again in that wonderful Republic of Sakha, about 260 miles north of that soup Restaurant in Morkoko, and 500 miles due west of Swan Tit.  Population: 2,273.  Distance from me: allegedly 4,768 miles, see note back at "Habardino".  Known for: They have their own flag...

Temp: -57.1.


2- Rabbit Kettle Automated Reporting Station (Canada)

Location:  The only place that I remember hitting from the last time I tried this, just across the Yukon border into the Northwest Territories, about 35 miles from the nearest 'town', Tungsten. Population:  You do understand "automated reporting station, right?  Tungsten doesn't help here; it's been a ghost town since 1988 or 89.  Distance from me: 2,231 miles. Known for: Low temps; and being stuck between Naatsjchoh and Nahani Nation Park Reserves.  Temp: -57.6.


And #1- Selogoncy, Russia

Location: 163 miles NNW of #3, surprise surprise. Population: It is a rural area whose big town is Eyik, clocking in at 344.  Distance from me: 4,929 miles, allegedly.  Known for:  Being on the shore of Lake Eyik, a seasonal home for the endangered Siberian Crane.


Temp: -57.8.  

Now, I know some of you are saying, Where's Antarctica?  It's coming up on summer down there...the South Pole is currently a balmy -20, while the North Pole, with Santa heating the area with his feverish final preps, is a whopping -9.


Friday, December 16, 2022

M10 show, week # 52

 

So this week, we're at a year's worth of posts, though actually more than a year in time, and...

Elvis:  Ichhh!  What're ya doin', boring the audience ta death?

You of all people should be happy, because I just had to bring in our old friend Nardole today!


E:  Hey, Noodle!  What're you doing here?

N: I'm sure I don't know...

Well, after what I just saw, I thought you might could use to be around some old friends...

E: What, what'd ya see?

Before I mention it, first we have two debuts this week, and we really should play the first.  Nardole, how about you do the intro?

N:  Something tells me this might be the ONLY pleasant part of this visit... At any rate, this debut comes from the Smashing Pumpkins, off their Atum 1 disc...at #10, this is Beyond The Vale...

 


**********************************************************

 

E: Awright, out with it!

Well, I was looking about the "Lists" feature on Comic Book Resources, and there was Nardole, right in between Rose Tyler and River Song...

E:  That's a pretty good place ta be, ya ask me!  So what's the catch...

Um... it was #9 on a list of "the most hated Doctor Who characters"...

E: WHAAAT?

N: Hated?  I wouldn't have thought anyone even cared...

Well, keep in mind it was just the opinion of this one writer...

E: What did she hate about him?  I always thought he was kinda cuddly...

N: SIR!  The hands, please!

She claims, " Given his jarring childlike charisma, Nardole often came off as dull to fans of Doctor Who."

 

E: "Jarring childlike charisma?"  Even I know ya can't have charisma an' be dull!  You don't worry about this, Noodle! She don' know what she's talkin' about! I once had some jerk call one a' my concerts, "a depressingly incoherent, amateurish mess served up by a bloated, stumbling and mumbling figure who didn't act like "The King" of anything, least of all rock 'n' roll."

N: And, was it?

E: How should I know?  I was so drugged up th... I mean, of course not!  I was just havin' some troubles sleepin' is all...

Maybe you should intro the other debut...

E: Well, if ya think I won' mumble... #9 is new stuff by a guy whose been around a long time, just never here.  This is called, Rebels Without Applause, and it's by Morrissey...

 

************************************************************

 

Nicely done!  I should mention that our poor shiny-topped friend here isn't the only one that got bad news... This week's Billboard Hot 100 put's Mariah Carey's All I Want For Christmas back at #1....

N: If I might ask, how does that constitute 'bad news'?

Because it officially ties her with Cher for oldest woman to hit #1, at 52 years old!

E:Haw! I bet she's lovin' that!

Of course, she was just 24 when she recorded it... Cher was 52 when Believe came out. And Carey's song took twenty-five years to actually hit the top, due to various, since-rescinded rules. The last time Cher hit the chart was Song For The Lonely, which hit #85 in 2002 when she was...

E: 85?

Actually 56...

N:  The two of you certainly went the long way around for THAT bit...

I agree, and I am certainly ashamed of myself...

E: Yeah, right...

...So let me end this with  the rest of the M10.

8- Smalltown Poets up 2 with Christmas Time Again... 

7- Up one for White Reaper and Pages...

6- Up 3 for Lucius and Muse...

5- Down 2 for the #1 song of 2022, and the new #2 all-time, Broken Bells and Love On The Run...

4- Down 2 for the #2 song of the year and the new #11 all-time, Lucius and The Man I'll Never Find...

3- Up 3 for Joji and Die For You...

2- Up two for the Four Seasons and Sleeping Man...

...and remaining at #1....

 


 ...Talk and Run Away To Mars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Well, that prolly put us on this year's naughty list... see you next week!

Wednesday, December 14, 2022

Wednesday Bible Study: Ladies night part 1

 

Since I had a little fun in titling the last series, "All The Kings, Men", I am inspired to be only fair and give the ladies- 12 specific ladies- their turn.  With the men, we found the overarching theme became, "Run the race in such a way as to win the prize (1 Cor 9:24)"- a feat almost all of them failed at.  I'm hoping the theme for these posts will be just as surprising and helpful.  I wasn't going to start with her at first, but with Christmas hard on our heels, let's start with Mary.

*****************************************************

I heard David Jeremiah say politely something along the lines of, "Even though Mary isn't as important as SOME churches think..." , and this is a problem if you were born Catholic.  There are a lot of things that Mary was NOT, that we have to set aside to be a Bible-based Christian:

She is NOT the 'Queen of Heaven'.  The only place that title is brought up is in Jeremiah 7 and 44, and not in a complimentary way.  The Catholic Church- once it became Roman- became a master of adopting and cleaning up pagan practices, including adapting the feast day of the 'Queen of Heaven'- known as Astarte, or (Biblically) Asheroth- into "Easter".

She was not 'assumed bodily' into heaven.  As far as I could learn, this was loosely based on a story in a gnostic 'gospel' that even they don't consider inspired.

She is NOT the go-between from us to Jesus.  Jesus Himself made it clear He was the only way to the Father (John 14:6)- and He named NO intermediaries.

She was Not 'immaculately conceived.'  She expressed her sinful nature in the fact that she needed God as her Savior (Luke 1:47).

She was not "Ever-Virgin". Matthew 1:25 clears that up with the little word, "until"...

Mat 1:24  When Joseph woke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: he took his wife,
Mat 1:25  but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus. 

 

Not to mention he had brothers- all named in the Bible- as well as sisters.   One brother led the Church in Jerusalem after Peter had to flee, two of them wrote books of the New Testament.


So, what was she? She was a poor girl, betrothed to a poor man.  We know this because of the gift they brought at her purification...

Luk 2:22  And when the time came for their purification according to the Law of Moses, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord
Luk 2:23  (as it is written in the Law of the Lord, "Every male who first opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord")
Luk 2:24  and to offer a sacrifice according to what is said in the Law of the Lord, "a pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons."

Which matches with the Law:

Lev 12:8  And if she cannot afford a lamb, then she shall take two turtledoves or two pigeons, one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering. And the priest shall make atonement for her, and she shall be clean.'" 

 

She accepted Joseph, as she should have, as the head of the household- it was Joseph that had the dreams that allowed them to flee to Egypt and come back.  After Joseph died, she became subject to Jesus as the head of the family, which we see not only at the Cana wedding, but what came right after:

Joh 2:12  After this he went down to Capernaum, with his mother and his brothers and his disciples, and they stayed there for a few days. 


The Gospels tell us that He based His ministry out of Capernaum- and he wouldn't need a base had He not a family he looked after.  And He couldn't quite trust in His brothers...

Joh 7:3  So his brothers said to him, "Leave here and go to Judea, that your disciples also may see the works you are doing.
Joh 7:4  For no one works in secret if he seeks to be known openly. If you do these things, show yourself to the world."
Joh 7:5  For not even his brothers believed in him.


But Mary did- she had seen the prophecies of Simeon and Anna.  That she remained a humble servant of God- and not a 'queen'- is born out by Jesus passing responsibility for her care to John at the Cross.

Joh 19:26  When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, "Woman, behold, your son!"
Joh 19:27  Then he said to the disciple, "Behold, your mother!" And from that hour the disciple took her to his own home.

 I asked myself, "Why John?  Why not Peter?" Because John had a family structure to fall back on- his mother was still living, and probably dad Zebedee, since he is not only mentioned by name many times, but someone had to keep the fishing company going, otherwise, they wouldn't have been able to go fishing after the Resurrection (John 21).  Peter had a wife, and was caring for a mother-in-law- so his father was likely dead.

The Resurrection changed a lot of things- but not for Mary:

Act 1:13  And when they had entered, they went up to the upper room, where they were staying, Peter and John and James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus and Simon the Zealot and Judas the son of James.
Act 1:14  All these with one accord were devoting themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and his brothers. 

 

And this, Dr Jeremiah points out, is the LAST time Mary is mentioned.  If all the things the Catholic Fathers came up with were true, how is it that her story ends right here?  That disposes of the 'she is not's, but what about the 'what she is's? There are two places to go to really learn about her- the prayer in front of the announcing angel, and the song she sang in front of Cousin Anna.

She had 'found favor with God; literally, God was happy with her (Luke 1, v 30)

She was smart enough to grasp what was going on, else she'd have never questioned the angel about the 'mechanics' of it (vv34-5)

She was humble (v48)

She put praising God first (vv46-55)

She knew the Scriptures well (v55)

But the most important thing about her was also pointed out by Dr Jeremiah in his devotional this week- "She had already passed from obligation to willingness":

Luk 1:38  And Mary said, "Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word." And the angel departed from her.


 And this was no easy willingness:  She knew Joseph would question the pregnancy; and if he did, so would the neighbors, since this was known as a dumpy Roman garrison town, and rumors spread that she was pregnant- willingly or not- by a Roman soldier; the rumors even gave him a name (Panthera). There was every chance that all hands would be against her; but she had faith in God, and the angel sent her to the one place where someone was guaranteed to understand- Cousin Anna, who was six months ahead of her with her own miraculous pregnancy.

This is not to say she didn't struggle; losing Jesus after the Temple trip showed she was first and foremost a mother:

Luk 2:48  And when his parents saw him, they were astonished. And his mother said to him, "Son, why have you treated us so? Behold, your father and I have been searching for you in great distress."
Luk 2:49  And he said to them, "Why were you looking for me? Did you not know that I must be in my Father's house?"
Luk 2:50  And they did not understand the saying that he spoke to them.
Luk 2:51  And he went down with them and came to Nazareth and was submissive to them. And his mother treasured up all these things in her heart. 


Or when she found herself secondary to Jesus's ministry:

Mat 12:46  While he was still speaking to the people, behold, his mother and his brothers stood outside, asking to speak to him.
Mat 12:47  [Someone told him, "Your mother and your brothers are standing outside, asking to speak to you."]
Mat 12:48  But he replied to the man who told him, "Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?"
Mat 12:49  And stretching out his hand toward his disciples, he said, "Here are my mother and my brothers!
Mat 12:50  For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother." 


But she hung tight, and she was there at the end- and the new beginning.  She wasn't only willing to do God's will- she was willing to have it DONE TO her;  and that's where a lot of us can't match her stride.

Monday, December 12, 2022

Martin World News


 Boy, it's been a long time, and most news STILL isn't that funny!  But I've found a page on BoredPanda (dot) com called "50 of the most unhinged local news headlines", and thought I might share a few, with commentary...


It takes a while scrolling down the list to find ones that are both amusing and clean enough to share here- I am trying to upgrade my standards from "High School"- so bear with me.


This item begs many questions- Why would someone put Ah-nold in their window (perhaps burglar security?), Why would some of these nervous parents (or staffers) not just walk over and ask what's going on (apparently "across the way" is fraught with pitfalls and man-traps?), and how much learning is actually accomplished by the "Learning Center"?



I'm going to guess sex was a bit odd here... but I guess when ironing is your biggest concern...


Here's "Better Proofreading Now!" #1...


Ask Keith Moon, it was a logical mistake...

"Better Proofreading Now!" #2...


Well, it WAS a critic post, wasn't it?  


See, if this community had "Baby Boxes" at fire stations like we have here, not only would the police have not been bothered, but a fireman could have been fed.

Here's a good Caveat Emptor posting...


Perhaps the driver should have called the 900 number at $10 per hour first...



Best to buy the sturdy chips for this one!



Now, I like Arsenal, but would never have named my daughter after a soccer team!  Hey, Shenan, wanna change your name to Snihplod?


Next up, the "You had to be there" award winner...



Makes you wonder what the girlfriend was dressed as... (NOTE:  I checked the article- doesn't say.  Maybe a box of Raisinettes?)


"Let's all go to the lobby..."

And finally, one from the "Color me skeptical" file...


"...it was biscuits AND gravy, darn you!"


If you wish, you can peruse the other 40 (#5 almost made it) at this page.