Australian woman gets workers' comp for sex-related injury during business trip
Published December 17, 2012
Associated Press
An Australian court has ruled that a bureaucrat who was injured while having sex on a business trip is eligible for workers' compensation benefits.
The Full Bench of the Federal Court ruled Dec. 13 in favor of the woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, and rejecting the appeal of the federal government's insurer, ending a five-year legal battle.
The woman was hospitalized after being injured in 2007 during sex with a male friend while staying in a motel in the town of Nowra, 100 miles south of her hometown of Sydney.
During the sex, a glass light fitting was torn from its mount above the bed and landed on her face, injuring her nose and mouth. She later suffered depression and was unable to continue working for the government.
Her claim for workers' compensation for her physical and psychological injuries was initially approved by government insurer Comcare, then rejected after further investigation.
An administrative tribunal agreed with Comcare that her injuries were not suffered in the course of her employment, saying the government had not induced or encouraged the woman's sexual conduct. The tribunal also found the sex was "not an ordinary incident of an overnight stay" such as showering, sleeping and eating.
That ruling was overturned in the Federal Court in 2012, when Judge John Nicholas rejected the tribunal's findings that the sex had to be condoned by the government if she were to qualify for compensation.
"If the applicant had been injured while playing a game of cards in her motel room, she would be entitled to compensation even though it could not be said that her employer induced her to engage in such activity," Nicholas wrote in his judgment in favor of the woman receiving compensation.
In the Full Bench decision upholding Nicholas' decision, Judges Patrick Keane, Robert Buchanan and Mordy Bromberg agreed last week that the government's views on the woman having sex in her motel room were irrelevant.
"No approval, express or implied, of the respondent's conduct was required," they said.
It is not yet clear how much compensation the woman will be paid.
Comcare was on Monday considering an appeal to the High Court, Australia's highest legal authority, Comcare spokesman Russ Street said.
"The issue is a significant one," Street said in a statement. "Workers need to be clear about their entitlements and employers should have an understanding of their responsibilities and how to support their staff."
The Full Bench of the Federal Court ruled Dec. 13 in favor of the woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, and rejecting the appeal of the federal government's insurer, ending a five-year legal battle.
The woman was hospitalized after being injured in 2007 during sex with a male friend while staying in a motel in the town of Nowra, 100 miles south of her hometown of Sydney.
During the sex, a glass light fitting was torn from its mount above the bed and landed on her face, injuring her nose and mouth. She later suffered depression and was unable to continue working for the government.
Her claim for workers' compensation for her physical and psychological injuries was initially approved by government insurer Comcare, then rejected after further investigation.
An administrative tribunal agreed with Comcare that her injuries were not suffered in the course of her employment, saying the government had not induced or encouraged the woman's sexual conduct. The tribunal also found the sex was "not an ordinary incident of an overnight stay" such as showering, sleeping and eating.
That ruling was overturned in the Federal Court in 2012, when Judge John Nicholas rejected the tribunal's findings that the sex had to be condoned by the government if she were to qualify for compensation.
"If the applicant had been injured while playing a game of cards in her motel room, she would be entitled to compensation even though it could not be said that her employer induced her to engage in such activity," Nicholas wrote in his judgment in favor of the woman receiving compensation.
In the Full Bench decision upholding Nicholas' decision, Judges Patrick Keane, Robert Buchanan and Mordy Bromberg agreed last week that the government's views on the woman having sex in her motel room were irrelevant.
"No approval, express or implied, of the respondent's conduct was required," they said.
It is not yet clear how much compensation the woman will be paid.
Comcare was on Monday considering an appeal to the High Court, Australia's highest legal authority, Comcare spokesman Russ Street said.
"The issue is a significant one," Street said in a statement. "Workers need to be clear about their entitlements and employers should have an understanding of their responsibilities and how to support their staff."
"I am sorry, I cannot continue to work for the government because my lover tried to play Tarzan with the chandelier and hit me in the face, giving me a fat lip, a bloody nose, a lack of satisfaction, and an excuse for a lawsuit. All of which has caused me to go into a blue funk that will hopefully be mitigated by getting a huge settlement which I can invest in sitting on my bum the rest of my life." All of you with chandeliers in your bedrooms, DO NOT ATTEMPT AT HOME!!!
Moving on, let me open up my junk file and see what we might have to amuse us today.
Al Penwasser's "Made In Spain" post (the one featuring Charo's ethnicity) continues to be a prime target, with at least two "comments" a week. Who knew that a mere title suggesting international manufacture could be so popular. I chose this one to feature because I know Al will love it:
Excellent goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff
previous to and you are just too magnificent. I really like what you have
acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it.
You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it wise.
I cant wait to read much more from you. This is
really a tremendous site.
My website :: Instalación geotermia en Madrid
Coherence: Not real good. "I have understand your stuff"? 4.
Germaine: Actually, this is somewhat good, because Al is entertaining while "taking care of to keep it wise". But is "you are just too magnificent" laying it on a bit thick? I'll let you judge. 2.
Link: Geothermic installation in Madrid? I thought driving to Kendallville was too far for a job. 1.
Score: 2.33.
Next up are a pair from Average Girl (minds outta the gutter, people). Her posting has been way down due to the utter chaos recently in Canada (or something like that), but she has still found time to be a target. The first one was sent to a hilarious post from last October about her battle with a certain girdle, and I can only guess that it was sent to suggest a way to win the battle:
bear grylls messer
My webpage > bear grylls messer
Which for those of us that don't speak German, means "Bear Grylls knife".
There, that outta get you out of that damn girdle! |
Coherence: Kind of a non-factor, but since it was in German and sent to an English-language blog, I'll give it a 3.
Germaine: Only if you take it my way. 5.
Link: ZZZZZZZZ. 1.
Score: 2.67.
The other one was sent to a post where she discussed her travails at promoting her online business. It almost seemed a serious comment- until you get to the link:
My developer is trying to persuade me to move to
.net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of
the costs. But he's tryiong none the less. I've
been using Movable-type on numerous websites for about a year and am nervous about switching
to another platform. I have heard very good things about blogengine.
net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into
it? Any help would be really appreciated!
Feel free to surf my web page lose weight
Coherence: Pretty good, actually. Other than having the same trouble I do at not hitting "i"s and "o"s at the same time. 1.
Germaine: in a warped sort of way. 2.
Link: She'll kill me if I comment. 4.
Score: would be the same as the first contestant, so I'll subtract a point to keep Al ahead. 2.32.
Next up are a pair from the highly entertaining Momto8 blog. This first one was sent to a post about becoming a grandmother:
Hi are using Wordpress for your
site platform? I'm new to the blog world but I'm
trying to get started and create my own. Do you require any coding knowledge
to make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Look at my web site :: Medical Malpractice attorneys
Obviously, the humour in this one is based yet again on the link. Why would medical malpractice attorneys seek advice on websites from a family blog? Because she used the word "attorney" in the post somewhere?
Coherence: 1. Intelligence would have been a 5, but we already knew that.
Germaine: 5. Absolutely off topic.
Link: 3. Not for itself, but for the reasons above.
Score: 3.00.
The second one was on one of her famous Wordless Wednesday posts. I think this one is best explained when you check out the post here.
When some one searches for his required thing, thus he/she wishes to be available that in detail, thus that thing is maintained
over here.
Have a look at my blog post ; vakantiewoningen bodensee
First of all, I think we have to wonder what this person's required thing is, and why he thinks it might be stuck in... well, you saw the picture. Second, the link is Dutch for "vacation on Lake Constance". I'm not sure which is more curious: having to use 16 letters to spell an eight-letter word (you silly Dutch!) or a Dutch site wanting you to vacation in Switzerland.
Coherence: Poor. 4.
Germaine: Non-existant. 5.
Link: Unusual. 2.
Score: 3.67. Nice job!
Next, we go over to JoAnne's Ramblings, and find that malpractice attorneys like her, too. From a post about her grandson's birthday:
Gday administrator, I just wanted to give you a quick heads
up that your current Link: http://www.blogger.com/comment.
g?blogID=2372897564928472255&postID=6427293591310152339 is being
flagged as a
potentially malicious blog in
my internet browser firefox. I would highly recommend having
somebody look
into it. You could certainly
lose a lot of website visitors due to this kind of
issue. Very best of Luck.
My site Malpractice attorney
Coherence: Good, though he claims the blog is flagged and the link is to a comment- probably his own. 1.
Germaine: No. A different twist, yes, but germaine, no. 3.
Link: Maybe they should call it "malpracticing attorneys." 2.
Score: 2.00.
I actually am changing my mind about the other one, but let me give you all a heads up: Post innocent pictures of people in bathing suits on the beach, and porn sites will be watching.
Next victim is Grumpy Old Ken, a gent from Jolly Ol' who is much nicer than his handle suggests. He wrote a post a while back about courtesy or lack thereof in retail companies called "Nice to be Nice", and ironically got this:
The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, but I actually thought youd have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could fix if you werent too busy looking for attention.
[url=http://cheapnfljerseys168.2kool4u.net/]NFL Throwback Jerseys[/url]
[url=http://jordansoutletgc.posterous.com/]jordan shoes[/url]
Coherence: Good for an a-hole. 3.
Germaine: This had as much to do with Ken's post as the anonymous whiner about gun control had on my post a while back. Not sure exactlt how they thought something like this would attract someone to their website. 4.
Link: You know the rules. -3.
Score: 1.33, minus two for being rude, so 1.31.
Finally, we get to some of my own. Here's one from a Sports Tuesday post:
Hi! Your write-up rocks also as being a respectable superb fully grasp!
??
I can??t actually support but admire your blog web site, your web-site
is adorable and nice
My spouse and I stumbled over here various web page and
thought I really should verify factors out.
I like what I see so i am just following you. Appear ahead
to discovering your internet web page yet again.
My web page > http://www.onbored.com/blog/view/341686/exactly-why-iphone-five-will-initial-be-introduced-freely-within-the-market
Coherence: Minimal. They ?? sure li??ke question ?? marks, don't they??? 4.
Germaine: While I like to think my write-ups have a superb fully grasp, I'm skeptical about them being adoreable. 3.
Link: I could care less about free i-Phones. 1.
Score: 2.67, but I like the other one better since it got a picture put in, so 2.66.
The next one came to a post I did on a Biblical look at bankruptcy:
hello!,I love your writing very much! proportion we keep up
a correspondence extra about your article on AOL? I need a specialist in this house to unravel my problem.
Maybe that is you! Looking ahead to look you.
Here is my web page ways2easycash.com
Coherence: What's that? I wonder if "proportion" was supposed to be "perhaps". Damnyouautocorrect! 3.
Germaine: Depends on the problem needing unravelled. Perhaps a playful kitten will do. 2.
Link: Certainly germaine, but not amusing. 1.
Score: Another 2, which I will bump up to 2.01. Sorry JoAnne!
Which about wraps us up for this week, other than a couple of scam-mails, one of which thinks Sensa can make me look great naked (perhaps if you are a very hungry Lion), and another that was a version of the standard "I have millions of dollars and am dying of brain cancer, let me send some money to you" story, only it was in French. The google translate version goes like this:
Hello
I apologize for this intrusion, I called Blackthorn LACROIX born November 6, 1963 a native of France.
Assistant in the office of the Interior Ministry of Benin near the FRANCE where I served for 9 years. I have you
contact of this kind because I want to do something very important. It will seem a little suspect though
true that you do not know me and I do not know you. I suffer from brain cancer which is in phase
terminal, my doctor just informed me that my days are counted because of my health condition deteriorates. By
that Dr. Ball justifies me now settled in my brain cage, I have this disease for more
4 years. I am a widow and I have no children.
I plan to donate all my possessions. I almost sold my business with a company
export wood from Canada where I live almost 30 years, part of that money will be paid a different
associations, and centers for orphans and the homeless. I do not know in what field of work you
exercise but I would help you. I have now in my personal account account blocked, the sum of 1
Million euro (one million euro) that I keep for a construction project. I'll give you that grated
money that can help you in your business, I beg you to accept this because it is a gift that I did and it
without asking anything in return.
I suffer a lot and I am very afraid, I can almost not sleep at night as during the day because I do not want
to die without having donated all the money otherwise I think it would be a mess.
Please contact me as soon as possible if you agree beings for my offer.
The peace of the Lord be with you.
I leave you my email so you can send me your news on this topic:
prunellelacroix@yahoo.fr
Good Understanding
Mrs. Prunelle LACROIX
So, my questions are:
- what is a brain cage?
- I know a cold can "settle in" certain places. Cancer can too?
- Why not just give it ALL to homeless and orphans?
- "so you can send me your news on the topic?" This just in...
And that wraps up another show! Congrats to Momto8 and her Dutch travel agent for the win.
What can I say but when I heard this about the woman on the news I thought what a bloody waste of money yes I am a cold hearted bitch at times but she shouldn't have got the payout......
ReplyDeleteSometimes I wonder who falls for those scammers emails then I watch A Current Affair and find out there are so many stupid people in the world, just not us........
I don't think it's cold blooded to wish the idiots of the world got their just deserts instead of our tax dollars.
DeleteWas she depressed about the light bulb or the outcome of the evening??
ReplyDeleteSeriously... If that's the case I should petition my former employer for the three years of wasted life with my ex. We met at work, our first "date" (ie time alone) was on a business trip, and he proceeded to give me grief for years after that. lol.
People really don't want to take responsibility for themselves these days do they?
Y'know, I met my ex on the job too... I wonder if the ship has sailed on that?
DeleteIs it wrong that I was just a tad happy to know that it's not just happening in the US? I thought only American's had gotten greedy. Maybe I should be sad instead? Perhaps that's the proper emotion.
ReplyDeleteSo, are you saying the email I got this morning to try out some eyewear and then review it is probably just spam? Darn. I was hoping I was on my way to becoming a millionaire. *sigh*
CWM:
ReplyDeleteROFLMAO...you DO manage to get the best scams.spams...!
ALl I get are TONS of "instant loans" and "approved credit"...
Like I want to send personal info JUST so I get good "rates"...from Germany, Romania, Uruguay, Vietnam(?), Singapore, Russia, China, or MY favorite...SOUTH AFRICA.
(yeah right).
Excellent post...really love that rating system you've got.
Stay safe up there.