Among the things I thought about is something going on over at DiscConnected's blog. Long story short, there's a documentary out there (which my son has been after me to watch) about the capture and treatment of Killer Whales at SeaWorld. Apparently the widely known expert on animal-human relations and lead singer of Heart, Ann Wilson, cancelled a show at SW after viewing the documentary, comparing the treatment of the whales to slavery. Late in the game, an anonymous commenter decided to allude to those of us who think "slavery" is an inappropriate word to use for animals (at least these animals) as being dumb. So, let's think about it. A KW at SeaWorld, yes, has been taken from their home. Yes, they are trained to do tricks. For this, they get a safe place to live (if a little more cramped than they're used to) and all the fish they can eat. And Ann Wilson and "anonymous" think that constitutes slavery. What is it that I consider slavery?
First, you have the one thing both groups have in common- being captured against their will. But Killer Whales aren't capturing other KWs and selling them to SeaWorld. Then, consider the trip- where SW takes as much care as possible to deliver the animal to the park, a Stanford study showed that close to 12% of prospective slaves died either directly before, during, and directly after the trip. The trip which consisted of being chained up lying down in the hold of a ship with no restrooms, little food, and packed like sardines up to 200-300 per ship. Then there is the 'training"- I'm sure the man pictured above would have loved being taught how to do right with fish instead of 40 lashes with a bullwhip. And I find it hard to believe that a crowd of tourists would react to a KW snuggling up to a dolphin by throwing a rope over the nearest tree branch.
I considered giving a possible example of animal slavery by posting a picture of a losing dog in a dogfight... but they are just too sickening. I suggest Anonymous might want to look at them, at his own peril. It is a far cry from anything thrown at the Killer Whales at SeaWorld. I'm not saying that if I watched the video I wouldn't swear off SW myself... just think that SOME people ought to think before they devaluate the pain real slaves went through.
Another thing I thought about was last night when Laurie got into it on FB with another one of those "How dare you teach your beliefs" types. She thought Laurie was monstrous for even suggesting a parent teach their belief systems to their OWN children. "Children should be free to decide on their own. Who are you to force them into what to believe?" Now, I am not going to waste my time anymore with such an utter moron, and advised Laurie not to. They won't hear anything but what they want to hear, anyway. But there are a few things I would have told them, had they the capability to listen to anything but their own poison.
First, part of the Task of Parenting is to "Raise up a child in the path they should go." You cannot expect a child to have any kind of healthy value system by "letting them figure it out for themselves." They would be forced to rely on instinct, watching other children who may or may not be "infected" by THEIR parents' value systems, and grow up to be the kind of rudderless, soulless moral degenerates that populate our jails after stealing without remorse, raping and molesting without conscience, killing without a care.
Second, children properly raised end up making their own choices AS ADULTS. How many stories about "pastors' kids" do you need to see that even a godly upbringing can be rejected. How many of you follow exactly the same faith as your parents, morally, politically, or spiritually? If I had clung to every dictum I was taught, I'd be a Catholic Democrat, voting mindlessly for the late fat man in Boston who thought to tell me I should eat healthy, and that killing babies is just fine. Probably root for Georgetown's basketball team, too. But as I matured, I asked questions. I learned about the difference between church tradition versus what the Bible says, about making an informed choice rather than voting a certain way because "we always vote that way", about the difference between "giving a man a fish and teaching him how to fish."
Third, The truth of the matter is that people like that have a simple, deluded goal- the same one too many people have. Rush Limbaugh this afternoon did a monologue about "If I could just give away other people's money all day like the POTUS, how popular I would be." In the midst of it, he said one thing that cut to the core of the philosophy of these people. Speaking as someone trying to use Obama's methods to be as popular as Obama, he said:
"I am the one who says if they want to smoke marijuana, I'm gonna stand in their way. I'm gonna support it. If two guys want to marry each other, I'm right in there. Whatever anybody wants to do is fine with me, and here's money for it to boot."
Whatever anybody wants to do is fine. You might say, yes, this is the liberal philosophy, the PC philosophy. But there is another whose philosophy matches this as well....
Please allow me to introduce myself... |
So many people think that "Satan" is the guy who possesses weak people, who buys your soul and drags you kicking and screaming into hell. But he gets his purpose fulfilled just as well by people "doing whatever they want to do." Sure, look at the internet porn and pretend you're too good to rape a child. Lie your ass off to get that promotion and call yourself "successful". Do whatever to whomever, and pretend to yourself there'll never be a comeuppance. Because there'll always be a way that seemeth right to a man.
Finally, one last thing- and I'm gonna get clobbered for this one. Laurie is not your typical person. Which is a good thing, because trying to figure out the rules of a relationship with someone like her keeps you from getting lazy about the relationship. For example, Valentine's Day. I learned very quickly that you have to strike first with her. Because whatever you do, she'll top. Not because she "needs" to be in first, or because she sees it as a competition. But because she's got a big heart, and her instinct is to give more than she receives. As such, it is infinitely better to get her something and be happy when she tops it, than to "get mad for being topped", or to go back out and get the next thing. So, yesterday, I got her a nice heart-shaped box of Russell Stover chocolates and a card. When I got up this morning, there was a similar box by my computer... and a bag of Lindor truffles. And I did the only two things I could do.
1- Looked at Scrappy and said with a smile, "Your boofy mommy..."
2- Ate half the truffles reading your blogs and e-mails.
If I don't mention it later, Happy Valentines Day!
Um, I hope you're not talking about mumbles Menino... I think he's still alive. But I will say, I wouldn't listen to him re: food choices... or ELA classes either. :)
ReplyDeleteI subscribe to the let children figure it out theory, but I give them a path and choices. Even if it's a different one than mine, because every choice (mine or theirs) will have a different outcome.
Lastly, we are not doing anything this year. I am also the topper here. Although I suspect, that when it's all said and done, I will receive some sort of chocolate, a finished newly painted living room, and a card. And in return, I will try not to drool on his shoulder on the way to Vegas. :)
I think that is just as good a plan as any- you HAVE to give them a direction. And the best way to do it is to live your path, walk your talk.
DeleteNote to Hubby- pack drool rag, place on shoulder.
Happy Valentines Day to you and Laurie. Yumm Lindor truffles! Those are some interesting tracks in the snow.
ReplyDeleteI think maybe bunny rabbit, but haven't got anywhere close. BTW the truffles are gone.
DeleteCHris:
ReplyDeleteI LOVE this post (yet, not in a "bromance" sense, mind you...lol)
When you go after a topic, you NAIL it straight away.
-- Your commentary os SLAVERY is spot on!
Nothing to add there.
Well said.
-- Your take on "TRAINING up a child" was brilliant.
(and I don't even have kids, but I WAS one in another lifetime)
My parents never "forced" me...they "highly suggested" instead...or ELSE...LOL.
And I'd like to think I didn't disappoint either of them.
(guess I'll find out eventually)
Good for Laurie for sticking to her values, too!
When did letting people (read kids) do whatever they want NOT become a form of ANARCHY, anyway?
(seems some people would prefer that scenario? I think not once they are exposed to such things)
-- Valentine's Day...well, I confess to not being AS into it as I used to be (when I was young, dumb and in "love" on a weekly basis)
I don't expect anything...I figure you feel the same about someone you choose to spend you life with ALL year, every year, as long as you're both alive.
(and sometimes after that even)
Excellent post.
Stsy safe & well-truffled up there.
I too confess Valentines isn't what it used to be... kinda sad, when I think about it.
DeleteYou hit the nail right on the head. Vacuous statements like that diminish the horror of slavery. But, then again, Ann Wilson is typical of celebrity morons. Help me out here, I can never get this straight. Is Ann the fat one?
ReplyDeleteYes, Ann's the one. Feeling a kinship with whales will do that!
DeleteHa!...
ReplyDeleteand Ha!-Ha!
Ronstadt got it wrong.
It should have been...
"Heart Like A Whale"
~ D-FensDogg
'Loyal American Underground'
People get weird with animals like whales yet we farm beef, sheep pigs chickens etc..
ReplyDeleteAs for Valentines, we agreed not to bother, I got him nothing, he gave me a rose. I said thankyou