Rev 12:3 And another sign was seen in the heavens. And behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on his heads!
Rev 12:4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and cast them onto the earth. And the dragon stood before the woman being about to bear, so that when she bears he might devour her child.
This is the passage in which we learn that Satan/Lucifer/the Dragon drew 1/3 of the angels with him in his rebellion. How did he manage this? We really don't know- but we can guess from his still-forming pattern. It started with a lie. One legend I read a long time back suggested he 'explained' to his followers that both he and God arose from some primordial energy, and the only difference between them was God arose first. However, I like JRR Tolkien's version in his "story of creation" in The Silmarillion: God created the angels to be a chorus, a harmony that was used to create the physical world. Tolkien's Satan began playing a 'discordant note' that ran against the song revealed by God, and the disharmony drew others near him in.
The difference in the stories is a bold lie versus a subtle one. One note provokes listening. Listening provokes a change of mind. Barely more than setting an example. And one third of 'myriads and myriads' fell.
This is how subtle Satan is. But you know what? There had to be a reason that the subtle lie was listened to. I want to show you that in the first lie to humanity.
Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which Jehovah God had made. And he said to the woman, Is it so that God has said, You shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Gen 3:2 And the woman said to the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden.
Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, You shall not eat of it, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.
Gen 3:4 And the serpent said to the woman, You shall not surely die,
Gen 3:5 for God knows that in the day you eat of it, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as God, knowing good and evil.
Now here's the part you might have overlooked. Take another look at verse three there, and compare:
Gen 2:16 And Jehovah God commanded the man, saying, You may freely eat of every tree in the garden,
Gen 2:17 but you shall not eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. For in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.
So where does, "neither shall you touch it" come from? Step by step: The first law God gave was to Adam, before Eve was drawn from him. Given the man's placement at the head of the family, we can safely assume that Adam was given the responsibility of teaching Eve...
1Co 14:34 Let your women be silent in the churches; for it is not permitted to them to speak, but to be in subjection, as the Law also says.
1Co 14:35 And if they desire to learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home; for it is a shame for a woman to speak in a church.
The point Paul was making is not to let questions interrupt and bog down the service; it was assumed that the husband, if godly, would understand first. If we believe (and I do) that Paul was inspired by the Holy Spirit, then it follows that Adam had the job of explaining to Eve.
If Eve just accepted God's Law without question, she could have hardly added the touch part. It makes one understand that Adam faced an Eve who questioned the why of things, and perhaps Adam added the touch part to end the discussion. But there WAS a discussion. Did the angels also have a discussion?
So, is questioning the root of sin? No- but trust is.
Mat 18:1 At that hour the disciples came to Jesus, saying, Who is the greater in the kingdom of Heaven?
Mat 18:2 And Jesus called a little child to Him and set him in their midst,
Mat 18:3 and said, Truly I say to you, Unless you are converted and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of Heaven.
Mat 18:4 Therefore whoever shall humble himself like this little child, this one is the greater in the kingdom of Heaven.
The difference between a doubting question and a child's question: A child will receive an answer they may not quite understand, because they TRUST the One they ask. But the doubting question? THAT was the opening that Satan needed to tell his lie.
-Step one: Begin the questioning: "Is it so...?"
-Step two: Size up the weakness: "...neither touch..."
-Step three: The bold part of the lie: "You will NOT surely die..."
- Step four: Cloak the bold lie in the original doubting question: "...then your eyes will be opened..."
-Step five: Await the results- is the doubt in the question enough to abandon childlike trust for human reason? God tells us:
Pro 3:5 Trust in Jehovah with all your heart, and lean not to your own understanding.
Pro 3:6 In all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your paths.
Pro 3:7 Do not be wise in your own eyes; fear Jehovah and depart from evil.
But Eve followed the doubt...
Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasing to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make wise, she took of its fruit, and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate.
If Eve had had that childlike faith that led her to trust in God- and by extension, in Adam- she would have never have been vulnerable to Satan's trick. But what about Adam? Surely HE had the ability to stop Eve in her tracks, and call upon the Lord. That he didn't tells us that he had been drawn in by the discussion as well. Again, discussion isn't the sin, but discussion that entertains doubt- that leads to an opening for Satan. It all comes down to the ability to see God as Great. To close off our avenue of vulnerability, we have to have the right perspective of God...
Isa 55:7 Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts; and let him return to Jehovah, and He will have mercy on him; and to our God, for He will abundantly pardon.
Isa 55:8 For My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor your ways My ways, says Jehovah.
Isa 55:9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts.