So the other day, my news aggregator sent me a story about "Best and worst cities to drive in" (you can find it here. I said to myself, "This is something Fort Wayne should actually be good at!"
We were the third best! Out of the USA's 100 biggest cities.
So let's look a little bit at how they determined this. (Which of course means, you don't have to hit the link, if you enjoysnarky commentary over dry stats.)
First category they used was hours in traffic per driver. Lubbock TX won that one, while your usual suspects- Boston, NYC, LA, Philly, and Chicago- tied for worst. They note that Chicago's total was 14 times that of Lubbock.
The next category they thought worthy was 'days with precipitation.' Not surprisingly, everything within 100 miles of Las Vegas had the least, and tied for #1. Also, no great surprise that the home of the enormous lake-effect blizzard every week from November till June, Buffalo NY, was worst.
Next they looked at how much more or less than the national average it was to get into an accident. Boise ID was the insurance company's dream; a somewhat familiar four way tie for worst had LA and Boston, and newcomers Washington, DC, and Baltimore. Apparently, ability to drive fades as you move east.
Next was car theft. I was surprised to see Hialeah, FL, as the best; in another 'but those are all liberal democrat cities' list, we have a 4-way for worst with Philly, Minneapolis, St Louis, Kansas City, and Oakland. Funny how that corresponds with 'defund the police' movements...
Repair shops per capita was next. Birmingham, AL, was your best bet; obviously, the score gets worse the more people you insert into the 'per capita', so NYC, LA, and Chicago lead the bad side.
Car washes (?) was next, and your best bet is anywhere in Florida. However, it seems that Madison WI doesn't care if your car is dirty.
Then, gas prices, which is where Fort Wayne and Indianapolis were 1-2. If you can't guess california (especially southern) was worst, you don't get out much. San Francisco headed the list of all-Cali, all-the time bad boys.
Auto Maintenence costs were all over the board. Jacksonville was best, Ohio put up 2 cities (Cleveland and Columbus), and St Louis got a little redemption. And on the high side, look to opposite ends of the nation- NYC 1, Honolulu 2.
Here's what they had to say about my home town:
Fort Wayne, IN, is the third-best city to drive in, largely because it’s an inexpensive city. It ranks as the ninth-cheapest city when it comes to the average parking rate. It’s also the cheapest city for gas, with the lowest average gas price among the 100 cities in our study. Fort Wayne also is the 24th-least expensive city for auto maintenance and second-least expensive for car insurance out of the 100 cities in our study.
Fort Wayne residents’ commutes aren’t too bad, as people only spend an average of 16 hours per year in congested traffic. That’s the sixth-fewest in the nation. In addition, Fort Wayne ranks as the 13th-best city for road maintenance.
Safety is also key while driving, and Fort Wayne has the 15th-lowest share of drivers that are uninsured. The city also boasts a relatively high number of auto repair shops per capita, offering residents convenient access to vehicle maintenance. Additionally, Fort Wayne has the 12th-highest number of roadway miles per capita, indicating strong road infrastructure and potentially lighter traffic congestion.
Two things stand out here. One, 13th best for road maintenance makes me a little scared to drive in these other cities. 2, that 15th lowest share of uninsured drivers ... I think maybe their next step should have been to calculate the much higher percentage of uninsured drivers in total accidents. I almost never see an accident where you don't hear, "the other guy was uninsured."
We've managed to hit the bottom five already- Philly, DC, LA, and NYC, with Detroit just beating out Chicago. Topping the list before us were Scottsdale AZ and Boise. They grouped their findings into four broader categories. Cost of ownership and maintenence was topped by Toledo, with us 3rd; 91-100 are all California cities. Traffic and infrastructure had Lubbock at the top, with us at 38th; NYC topped the worst, beating out Chicago. Boise was tops for safety, we were 18th; the least safe was another 'blue city' list: Detroit, Memphis, St Louis, Baltimore, DC, and of course Philly. Final category was 'access to vehicles and maintenence', and here Miami and Orlando ruled, with Fort Wayne having its worst spot at 60. Bottom on this set was the unlikely pair of Anchorage, Alaska, and our dirty car capital, Madison.
And there you have it. Where does your town fit in?
.jpg)