This was a scuffling week; but I am back on the path, and hope what I did get done helps you as well....
Thoughts on every subject, pc be hanged
This was a scuffling week; but I am back on the path, and hope what I did get done helps you as well....
Today's regular Time Machine post will not be seen this week. I don't have COVID, but something laid me out Wednesday, and Thursday typing night is not going to be a go. Tune in next week for what will then be last week's show!
The Song of Solomon is not a favorite to teach on; its intimacy between a man and a woman is what Chuck Swindoll means when he says the Word of God is " sometimes, downright raw." But one thing I have always known is, you can take this both as a work of beautiful poetry, a guide on love and marriage, and an allegory about Christ and His Church. But that doesn't make it easier to teach. Praying for insight on this this week, I heard David Jeremiah ask the question to his audience, "How do YOU read your Bible?" One thing that struck my mind is to read it like a letter from God, and the implications on this last chapter of SOS became quickly apparent to me.
Every letter written properly contains three parts: a beginning, an introduction, and a summary conclusion. And having been poring over this chapter, I saw it had all three.
Introduction
Son 8:1 Oh that you were like a brother to me who nursed at my mother's breasts! If I found you outside, I would kiss you, and none would despise me.
Son 8:2 I would lead you and bring you into the house of my mother-- she who used to teach me. I would give you spiced wine to drink, the juice of my pomegranate.
Son 8:3 His left hand is under my head, and his right hand embraces me!
Son 8:4 I adjure you, O daughters of Jerusalem, that you not stir up or awaken love until it pleases.
The introduction- if we go the allegory route- starts with the absolute devotion of Church to Christ, not in any base sexual way, but as a family, brother-sister level. A Level that brings Christ into the home, into every intimate part of life- yet with the admonition of propriety, remembering to Fear God.
The Body
Now here I have to step fully into allegory, and remember that of those who say they believe in God, there are two camps that criticize the True Church. The first come up in the passage that my Bible describes as 'the Kinsman':
Son 8:5 Who is that coming up from the wilderness, leaning on her beloved? Under the apple tree I awakened you. There your mother was in labor with you; there she who bore you was in labor.
This would be the "I knew you when" crowd- those who haven't the wisdom to see the difference between one who is a Christian in truth and people who say they are, and commit all manner of atrocities in 'the name of the Lord'. The Shulamite- the Church- faithfully re-explains her desire for Christ; and then the second group comes in- "her brothers":
Son 8:8 We have a little sister, and she has no breasts. What shall we do for our sister on the day when she is spoken for?
Son 8:9 If she is a wall, we will build on her a battlement of silver, but if she is a door, we will enclose her with boards of cedar.
These 'believers' do not believe the True Church has the proper wisdom or guidance. Bereft of the "Church fathers" and the interpretations they hand down, they are deemed children who know nothing, and need to be shut behind battlements and walls and not left to seek Christ for themselves. But she has an answer for these false brothers, as well:
Son 8:10 I am a wall, and my breasts are my towers. And he is satisfied with me!
Conclusion
Here at last we have interaction between the Shulamite/the True Church and her Beloved/Christ:
Son 8:12 (Her) My vineyard, my very own, is before me; you, O Solomon, may have the thousand, and the keepers of the fruit two hundred.
Son 8:13 (Him) O you who dwell in the gardens, with companions listening for your voice; let me hear it.
Son 8:14 (Her) Make haste, my beloved, and be like a gazelle or a young stag on the mountains of spices.
The Church submits her all to Christ; He calls out to her, and she cries out for His return!
So today apparently Blogger is celebrating "Put the pictures up in reverse order" day, but it was too nice a walk to worry about such things.
| So here we are later on at the Swamp, where the flock is being quite noisy. |
| Here at Scrappy's Landing, you can see the river is way down... |
| That was moments after we arrived at the Duck Pond... |
| ...where I would have already told you, "The last time we were here, the fox must have bagged a couple of geese. Thankfully, he came back the next night and finished the meal." |
| Here we are arriving at the Duck Pond. This is kinda like Time Machine, isn't it? |
| Winner, first ground hog false alarm picture. |
And now, the next six pictures, which I assume will be backwards, as well.
Well, surprise surprise, this is the right order.
| Meanwhile, back at the Swamp, let sleeping ducks lie. |
| Toldja the river was down... |
| Down enough I had to walk through this to let Misty get her drink. |
Here come the last four, God only knows which way they'll be...
| Well, there's the clam shell we found, so that's in the right order... |
| About to barge through a field of geese and killdeers... |
| I miss the Old Bridge... |
| Somebody must be going to play Slippery Rock... |
The week in Better Part FB posts:
Today is March 12, 1964 here in the ol' Tardis, and how's about THIS story...
The U.S. House of Representatives voted against raising their salaries by 45 percent (from $22,500 to $32,500 annually), declining, 184–222, to approve a bill that would have raised the salaries of 1.7 million other U.S. government employees. While the original intention was to have the measure made subject to a voice vote, where it would not be clear which individual Congress members wanted to give themselves pay raises, about one half of those present supported a motion to put the matter to a roll call vote. For the record, Democrats supported the measure 149 to 86, while the Republican vote was only 35 for and 136 against.
Just to be fair, I thought I would see how that stacks up today. In fact, the last time Congress VOTED themselves a raise was in 1991; since then, they have an automatic adjustment factor. To their credit, they have voted the auto-increase DOWN more often than not, the last raise, of 2.8%, came in 2009- before I started this blog! In fact, had they taken every adjustment allowed since they kicked in in '92, they would be making $44,600 more than they are- more than they made altogether in'64! Of course, they're also making 7.7 times more now than they were back then... Although by not taking the adjustment in 12 years, adjusted for inflation, Member salaries decreased approximately 17% from 2009 until 2020.
****************************************************
And as we are in 1964, you know this will be a Beatle-centric post, with 7 Beatles songs on the top 150, and 5 more about them.
![]() |
| Man, here we go again! |
So I'm going to try and break this up with a three way contest this week- along with a live 6D, 2 new M10 debuts, and the mounting tension of, does American Pie redone become the first 5-week #1 in M10 history! All this and Skeeter Davis, too!
***********************************************
First, the debut at # 10, and this is a familiar, if not seen in a while, face on the M10! With her third trip into the ten, here's Dami Im...
This is a chapter we studied at least once before, in my look at the mistakes made by David. And even then, I believe I noted the discrepancies between the telling here and the retelling in 1 Chronicles 24. I have always said that you know the Bible is true because a God who made the universe can keep his Word the way He wants it over time. But there are seven spots of contradiction here that seem to put that in doubt. Or do they? Now you can study them contradiction against contradiction, and try to find a common truth the hard way. But as I set myself to do that, I was moved to say, look at these contradictions versus the seven things that stay the same. And here we get a perspective on what's important to man vs what's important to God.
First, a thumbnail of the events:
Because of some way that Israel had angered God, David gets the idea to take a census- something only done previously when God requested it. Joab tries to fight him on it, but has to submit. As soon as it was done, David knew he messed up, and repented. So God, through the seer Gad, gave him three choices of punishment. David nebulously asked to be put at the mercy of God and not man. God took that as the choosing of a plague to strike Israel. As the plague- symbolized as the Angel of the Lord striking the nation- reached to Jerusalem, David realized his second mistake and pleaded for mercy. But God had already put things on pause, and had David buy the threshing floor on the top of Mount Moriah to build an altar on. That would go on to be the spot David pickled for Solomon to build the Temple.
The contradictions:
1- Did God incite David (Samuel), or did Satan (Chronicles)? 'Who's to blame' is the question man asks. But God already showed us in the Book of Job that He can use Satan's wrath to reach His ultimate goal,
2- Joab went through all the land (S) versus he skipped Levi and Benjamin (C). This isn't even a contradiction- Levi did not have land of its own, and Benjamin was part of Judah. This is a semantic difference, important to man but not to God.
3- The numbers don't match- was it 1.3 million (S) or 1.57 million (C)? The number was, at the time, important to David- but not to God. God doesn't rule by statistics.
4- Is his name Araunah (S) or Ornan (C)? Considering it was a foreign name (He was, after all, a Jebusite) and there was at the least 300 years between the writings, this is more or less an "is his name Bill or William" question.
5- Did David see the Angel in Jerusalem, or "Standing between Heaven and Earth" approaching it- and were the elders with him or not? If you remember Paul's conversion, what was seen by Paul was only perceived as a bright light to those who were with him. In either event, this is picking nits.
6- Did Araunah see just David (S), or did Ornan see the Angel as well (C)? A/O is important to this story for one reason, and this ain't it.
7- The biggie to men: Did David pay 50 sheckels of silver (S) or 600 of gold (C)? I want you to keep this in mind: There is only one time an amount of money was important in the Biblical narrative- the 30 pieces of silver that Judas received for his betrayal, because it was the amount paid for a slave in Exodus, and prophesied by Zechariah.
Now, the things important to God, which stayed the same:
1- Joab even tried to convince David against it, but David had closed his mind to everything but his sin at this point. I feel this closed-ness when I sin, too.
2- David repented as soon as the deed was done- he recognized as soon as the deed was finished it was wrong- because that's when Satan lets you go and starts accusing you.
3- God gave David the choices of punishment. And those choices were, basically, YOU will suffer, SOME will suffer, or ALL will suffer. Whatever his motivations, David chose the "some" option. To men, misery loves company.
4- Here is the one census number important to God- 70,000 died from David's sin and David's choice. This is called the consequence of the choice, children.
5- Before David even fell on his face to beg God to relent, God had already called a halt to the deaths- though not to the danger. It was all under God's control- right down to David's actions.
6- But yet, David repented of his choice- his second error in the mess, perhaps- and pled with God to spare the people. At last, he had been brought to a point of thinking of others instead of himself.
7- God commanded the altar be built, which was the finish of the three things God intended to accomplish. And those three were:
- to punish Israel for angering Him;
-to bring David out of selfishness to truly care about those he led;
- and establish the Temple where He wanted it- on the top of Mount Moriah, current home of the threshing floor of A/O the Jebusite.
So see, when you read a passage from what GOD thinks is important, and not by what man does, it all makes sense. Did God let this passage get messed up because of this lesson? Who can truly say? What we can say, though, it is in there because God willed it.